本文介绍了是否有任何理由在删除之前检查 NULL 指针?的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧！
问题描述
我经常看到遗留代码在删除指针之前检查NULL，类似于，
I often see legacy code checking for NULL before deleting a pointer, similar to,
if (NULL != pSomeObject)
{
delete pSomeObject;
pSomeObject = NULL;
}
是否有任何理由在删除之前检查 NULL 指针?之后将指针设置为NULL的原因是什么?
Is there any reason to checking for a NULL pointer before deleting it? What is the reason for setting the pointer to NULL afterwards?
推荐答案
删除空指针是完全安全"的；它实际上相当于一个空操作.
It's perfectly "safe" to delete a null pointer; it effectively amounts to a no-op.
您可能希望在删除之前检查 null 的原因是尝试删除空指针可能表明您的程序中存在错误.
The reason you might want to check for null before you delete is that trying to delete a null pointer could indicate a bug in your program.
编辑
注意:如果重载删除操作符，删除NULL
NOTE: if you overload the delete operator, it may no longer be "safe" to delete NULL
这篇关于是否有任何理由在删除之前检查 NULL 指针?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持跟版网！
本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益，请联系我们，我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除！