*(Pointer + Index) 和 Pointer[] 的区别

Difference Between *(Pointer + Index) and Pointer[](*(Pointer + Index) 和 Pointer[] 的区别)
本文介绍了*(Pointer + Index) 和 Pointer[] 的区别的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

int* myPointer = new int[100];

// ...

int firstValue = *(myPointer + 0);
int secondValue = myPointer[1];

*(myPointer + index)myPointer[index] 之间有什么功能上的区别吗?哪个被认为是更好的做法?

Is there any functional difference between *(myPointer + index) and myPointer[index]? Which is considered better practice?

推荐答案

在功能上,它们是相同的.

Functionally, they are identical.

从语义上讲,指针取消引用表示这是一件事,但我真的很关心 X 空格",而数组访问说这是一堆事情,我关心 Xcode>Xth 一个."

Semantically, the pointer dereference says "Here's a thing, but I really care about the thing X spaces over", while the array access says "Here's a bunch of things, I care about the Xth one."

在大多数情况下,我更喜欢数组形式.

In most cases, I would prefer the array form.

这篇关于*(Pointer + Index) 和 Pointer[] 的区别的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!

本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!

相关文档推荐

Could I ever want to access the address zero?(我可以想访问地址零吗?)
C++ Access derived class member from base class pointer(C++ 从基类指针访问派生类成员)
Weird Behaviour with const_cast(const_cast 的奇怪行为)
Are pointer variables just integers with some operators or are they quot;symbolicquot;?(指针变量只是带有某些运算符的整数还是“符号?)
Modifying a char *const string(修改 char *const 字符串)
Modifying a const int in C++(修改 C++ 中的 const int)