寻找优雅高效的C++矩阵库

Looking for an elegant and efficient C++ matrix library(寻找优雅高效的C++矩阵库)
本文介绍了寻找优雅高效的C++矩阵库的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

您好,谷歌搜索该主题会带来,例如,MTL、exmat, LAPACK还有这里.我似乎也记得微软研究院发布了一个,但我不能动手.我向实际使用(或开发...)其中之一的人寻求建议,希望在 C++ 中获得 Matlab 体验(尽可能多).提前致谢,罗比

Greetings, googling for that subject brings, e.g., MTL, exmat, LAPACK and also here. I also seem to remember that Microsoft Research released one, but can't put my hands on it. I look for advice from someone who actually used (or developed...) one of those, hoping to achieve a Matlab experience inside C++ (as much as possible). Thanks in advance, Robi

推荐答案

看看 Armadillo,文档有一个 语法转换表供 Matlab 用户使用,并且有针对其他 C++ 矩阵库的基准网站.我觉得它非常用户友好.

Have a look at Armadillo, the docs have a syntax conversion table for Matlab users and there are benchmarks against other C++ matrix libraries in the website. I find it very user friendly.

这篇关于寻找优雅高效的C++矩阵库的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!

本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!

相关文档推荐

Prevent class inheritance in C++(防止 C++ 中的类继承)
Why should I declare a virtual destructor for an abstract class in C++?(为什么要在 C++ 中为抽象类声明虚拟析构函数?)
Why is Default constructor called in virtual inheritance?(为什么在虚拟继承中调用默认构造函数?)
C++ cast to derived class(C++ 转换为派生类)
C++ virtual function return type(C++虚函数返回类型)
Is there any real risk to deriving from the C++ STL containers?(从 C++ STL 容器派生是否有任何真正的风险?)