如何在 OpenCV 中用零填充矩阵?

How to fill Matrix with zeros in OpenCV?(如何在 OpenCV 中用零填充矩阵?)
本文介绍了如何在 OpenCV 中用零填充矩阵?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

下面的代码导致异常.为什么?

The code below causes an exception. Why?

#include <opencv2/core/core.hpp>
#include <iostream>

using namespace cv;
using namespace std;

void main() {

    try {
        Mat m1 = Mat(1,1, CV_64F, 0);
        m1.at<double>(0,0) = 0;
    }
    catch(cv::Exception &e) {
        cerr << e.what() << endl;
    }

}

错误如下:

OpenCV Error: Assertion failed (dims <= 2 && data && (unsigned)i0 < (unsigned)size.p[0] && (unsigned)(i1*DataType<_Tp>::channels) < (unsigned)(size.p[1]*channels()) && ((((sizeof(size_t)<<28)|0x8442211) >> ((DataType<_Tp>::depth) & ((1 << 3
) - 1))*4) & 15) == elemSize1()) in unknown function, file %OPENCV_DIR%uildincludeopencv2coremat.hpp, line 537

更新

如果跟踪这段代码,我看到构造函数行调用了构造函数

If tracing this code, I see that constructor line calls the constructor

inline Mat::Mat(int _rows, int _cols, int _type, void* _data, size_t _step)

为什么?这个原型有 5 个参数,而我提供了 4 个参数.

Why? This prototype has 5 parameters, while I am providing 4 arguments.

推荐答案

因为最后一个参数是可选的,而且数据指针应该指向适当的地方:

Because the last parameter is optional and also the data pointer should point somewhere appropriate:

//inline Mat::Mat(int _rows, int _cols, int _type, void* _data, size_t _step)
double mydata[1];
Mat m1 = Mat(1,1, CV_64F, mydata); 
m1.at<double>(0,0) = 0;

但最好直接使用这个基于模板的构造函数:

But better do it directly with this template-based constructor:

//inline Mat::Mat(int _rows, int _cols, int _type, const Scalar& _s)
Mat m1 = Mat(1,1, CV_64F, cvScalar(0.));

//or even
Mat m1 = Mat(1,1, CV_64F, double(0));

这篇关于如何在 OpenCV 中用零填充矩阵?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!

本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!

相关文档推荐

Prevent class inheritance in C++(防止 C++ 中的类继承)
Why should I declare a virtual destructor for an abstract class in C++?(为什么要在 C++ 中为抽象类声明虚拟析构函数?)
Why is Default constructor called in virtual inheritance?(为什么在虚拟继承中调用默认构造函数?)
C++ cast to derived class(C++ 转换为派生类)
C++ virtual function return type(C++虚函数返回类型)
Is there any real risk to deriving from the C++ STL containers?(从 C++ STL 容器派生是否有任何真正的风险?)