透视投影和视图矩阵:深度缓冲区和三角形面方向在 OpenGL 中反转

Perspective projection and view matrix: Both depth buffer and triangle face orientation are reversed in OpenGL(透视投影和视图矩阵:深度缓冲区和三角形面方向在 OpenGL 中反转)
本文介绍了透视投影和视图矩阵:深度缓冲区和三角形面方向在 OpenGL 中反转的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我在 OpenGL 中的场景有问题.应该更远的对象被拉近等等,并且正面的三角形被剔除而不是背面的三角形.它们以正确的方向绘制,因为它是我以前使用过的包.我确信这与我的投影或 veiwModel 矩阵有关.不过我看不出这些有什么问题!

AV4X4FLOAT formProjMatrix(float FOVangle,float aspect,float nearz,float farz){AV4X4FLOAT A;A.m[0] = 1/(aspect*tanf(FOVangle/2));A.m[5] = 1/tanf(FOVangle/2);A.m[10] = farz/(farz-nearz);A.m[11] = -nearz*farz/(farz-nearz);上午[14] = 1;返回A;}

AV4X4FLOAT formViewModelMatrix(AV4FLOAT pos,AV4FLOAT target,AV4FLOAT up){AV4X4FLOAT M;AV4X4FLOAT R;AV4FLOAT你;AV4FLOAT v;AV4FLOAT W;W.x = -pos.x + target.x;W.y = -pos.y + target.y;W.z = -pos.z + target.z;W.w = 0;W.normalize();u.x = up.y*W.z-W.y*up.z;u.y = -up.x*W.z+W.x*up.z;u.z = up.x*W.y-W.x*up.y;u.w = 0;u.normalize();v.x = W.y*u.z-u.y*W.z;v.y = -W.x*u.z+u.x*W.z;v.z = W.x*u.y-u.x*W.y;v.w = 0;M.m[0] = u.x;M.m[1] = u.y;M.m[2] = u.z;M.m[3] = 0;M.m[4] = v.x;M.m[5] = v.y;M.m[6] = v.z;M.m[7] = 0;M.m[8] = -W.x;M.m[9] = -W.y;M.m[10] = -W.z;M.m[11] = 0;M.m[12] = 0;M.m[13] = 0;M.m[14] = 0;M.m[15] = 1;R.m[0] = 1;R.m[5] = 1;R.m[10] = 1;R.m[15] = 1;R.m[12] = -pos.x;R.m[13] = -pos.y;R.m[14] = -pos.z;//由于我们重载mult运算符的方式,与您期望的相反!M.display();R.display();返回 M*R;}

这就是我在我的绘图程序中所说的.

glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION);glLoadMatrixf(projMatrix.m);glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW);glLoadMatrixf(viewModelMatrix.m);

一些其他信息,

是的,我启用了深度测试!

解决方案

投影矩阵的计算存在一些问题.你必须像这样调整你的代码:

AV4X4FLOAT formProjMatrix(float FOVangle,float aspect,float nearz,float farz){AV4X4FLOAT A;A.m[0] = 1.0/(aspect*tanf(FOVangle/2));A.m[5] = 1.0/tanf(FOVangle/2);A.m[10] = (nearz+farz)/(farz-nearz);A.m[11] = - 2.0 * Nearz*farz/(farz-nearz);上午[14] = - 1.0;返回A;}

透视投影矩阵如下所示:

r = 右,l = 左,b = 底部,t = 顶部,n = 近,f = 远2*n/(r-l) 0 0 00 2*n/(t-b) 0 0(r+l)/(r-l) (t+b)/(t-b) -(f+n)/(f-n) -10 0 -2*f*n/(f-n) 0

如下:

aspect = w/htanFov = tan( fov_y * 0.5 );p[0][0] = 2*n/(r-l) = 1.0/(tanFov * aspect)p[1][1] = 2*n/(t-b) = 1.0/tanFov

以下函数将计算与 gluPerspectiveglm::perspective 相同的投影矩阵:

#include 

以下代码与 gluLookAtglm::lookAt 的作用相同:

使用 TVec3 = std::array<浮动,3>;使用 TVec4 = std::array<浮动,4>;使用 TMat44 = std::array;TVec3 Cross( TVec3 a, TVec3 b ) { return { a[1] * b[2] - a[2] * b[1], a[2] * b[0] - a[0] * b[2], a[0] * b[1] - a[1] * b[0] };}浮动点(TVec3 a,TVec3 b){ return a[0]*b[0] + a[1]*b[1] + a[2]*b[2];}void Normalize(TVec3 & v){float len = sqrt( v[0] * v[0] + v[1] * v[1] + v[2] * v[2] );v[0]/= len;v[1]/= len;v[2]/= len;}TMat44 Camera::LookAt( const TVec3 &pos, const TVec3 &target, const TVec3 &up ){TVec3 mz = { pos[0] - 目标[0], pos[1] - 目标[1], pos[2] - 目标[2] };归一化( mz );TVec3 my = { up[0], up[1], up[2] };TVec3 mx = Cross(my, mz);归一化(mx);我的 = 交叉(mz,mx);TMat44 v{TVec4{ mx[0], my[0], mz[0], 0.0f },TVec4{ mx[1], my[1], mz[1], 0.0f },TVec4{ mx[2], my[2], mz[2], 0.0f },TVec4{ 点(mx, pos), 点(my, pos), -Dot(mz, pos), 1.0f }};返回 v;}

像这样调整你的代码:

AV4X4FLOAT formViewModelMatrix(AV4FLOAT pos,AV4FLOAT target,AV4FLOAT up){AV4FLOAT mz;mz.x = pos.x - 目标.x;mz.y = pos.y - target.y;mz.z = pos.z - target.z;mz.w = 1.0f;mz.normalize();AV4FLOAT 我的;my.x = up.x;my.y = up.y;my.z = up.z;我的.w = 1.0f;AV4FLOAT mx;mx.x = my.y*mz.z - my.z*mz.y;mx.y = my.z*mz.x - my.x*mz.z;mx.z = my.x*mz.y - my.y*mz.x;mx.w = 1.0f;mx.normylize();my.x = mz.y*mx.z - mz.z*mx.y;my.y = mz.z*mx.x - mz.x*mx.z;my.z = mz.x*mx.y - mz.y*mx.x;我的.w = 1.0f;AV4FLOAT t;t.x = mx.x*pos.x + mx.y*pos.y + mx.z*pos.z;t.y = my.x*pos.x + my.y*pos.y + my.z*pos.z;t.z = -(mz.x*pos.x + mz.y*pos.y + mz.z*pos.z);AV4X4FLOAT米;m[0] = mx.x;m[1] = my.x;m[2] = mz.x;m[3] = 0.0f;m[4] = mx.y;m[5] = my.y;m[6] = mz.y;米[7] = 0.0f;m[8] = mx.z;m[9] = my.z;m[10] = mz.z;m[11] = 0.0f;m[12] = t.x;m[13] = t.y;m[14] = t.z;m[15] = 1.0f;返回米}


进一步查看以下问题的答案:

  • 如何在现代 OpenGL 中使用片段着色器中的 gl_FragCoord.z 线性渲染深度?
  • 如何在给定视图空间深度值和 ndc xy 的情况下恢复视图空间位置
  • 变换模型矩阵
  • 自定义视图矩阵的拉伸问题

I am having trouble with my scene in OpenGL. Objects that are supposed to be further away are drawn closer etc AND front facing triangles are being culled instead of back facing ones. They are drawn in the correct orientation as it is a package I have used before. I am convinced that it is something to do with my projection or veiwModel matrix. I can not see anything wrong with these though!

AV4X4FLOAT formProjMatrix(float FOVangle,float aspect,float nearz,float farz)
{
    AV4X4FLOAT A;

    A.m[0] = 1/(aspect*tanf(FOVangle/2));
    A.m[5] = 1/tanf(FOVangle/2);
    A.m[10] = farz/(farz-nearz);
    A.m[11] = -nearz*farz/(farz-nearz);
    A.m[14] = 1;
    return A;
}

AV4X4FLOAT formViewModelMatrix(AV4FLOAT pos,AV4FLOAT target,AV4FLOAT up)
{ 
    AV4X4FLOAT M;
    AV4X4FLOAT R;
    AV4FLOAT u;
    AV4FLOAT v;
    AV4FLOAT W;

    W.x = -pos.x + target.x;
    W.y = -pos.y + target.y;
    W.z = -pos.z + target.z;

    W.w = 0;
    W.normalize();

    u.x = up.y*W.z-W.y*up.z;
    u.y = -up.x*W.z+W.x*up.z;
    u.z = up.x*W.y-W.x*up.y;
    u.w = 0;
    u.normalize();

    v.x = W.y*u.z-u.y*W.z;
    v.y = -W.x*u.z+u.x*W.z;
    v.z = W.x*u.y-u.x*W.y;
    v.w = 0;

    M.m[0]  = u.x;  M.m[1]  = u.y;  M.m[2]  = u.z;  M.m[3]  = 0;
    M.m[4]  = v.x;  M.m[5]  = v.y;  M.m[6]  = v.z;  M.m[7]  = 0;
    M.m[8]  = -W.x; M.m[9]  = -W.y; M.m[10] = -W.z; M.m[11] = 0;
    M.m[12] = 0;    M.m[13] = 0;    M.m[14] = 0;    M.m[15] = 1;

    R.m[0] = 1;
    R.m[5] = 1;
    R.m[10] = 1;
    R.m[15] = 1;
    R.m[12] = -pos.x;
    R.m[13] = -pos.y;
    R.m[14] = -pos.z;

//the opposite of what you expect because of the way we overload mult operator!
    M.display ();
    R.display ();
    return M*R;
}

This is what I call in my drawing routine.

glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION);
glLoadMatrixf(projMatrix.m);

glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW);
glLoadMatrixf(viewModelMatrix.m);

Some otherinfo,

Yes, I have enabled depth testing!

解决方案

There are some issues with in the calculation of the projection matrix. You have to adapt your code like this:

AV4X4FLOAT formProjMatrix(float FOVangle,float aspect,float nearz,float farz)
{
    AV4X4FLOAT A;

    A.m[0]  = 1.0 / (aspect*tanf(FOVangle/2));
    A.m[5]  = 1.0 / tanf(FOVangle/2);
    A.m[10] =  (nearz+farz)/(farz-nearz);
    A.m[11] = - 2.0 * nearz*farz/(farz-nearz);
    A.m[14] = - 1.0;
    return A;
}

The Perspective Projection Matrix looks like this:

r = right, l = left, b = bottom, t = top, n = near, f = far

2*n/(r-l)      0              0               0
0              2*n/(t-b)      0               0
(r+l)/(r-l)    (t+b)/(t-b)    -(f+n)/(f-n)   -1    
0              0              -2*f*n/(f-n)    0

it follows:

aspect = w / h
tanFov = tan( fov_y * 0.5 );

p[0][0] = 2*n/(r-l) = 1.0 / (tanFov * aspect)
p[1][1] = 2*n/(t-b) = 1.0 / tanFov

The following function will calculate the same projection matrix as gluPerspective or glm::perspective does:

#include <array>

const float cPI = 3.14159265f;
float ToRad( float deg ) { return deg * cPI / 180.0f; }

using TVec4  = std::array< float, 4 >;
using TMat44 = std::array< TVec4, 4 >;

TMat44 Perspective( float fov_y, float aspect )
{
    float fn = far + near
    float f_n = far - near;
    float r = aspect;
    float t = 1.0f / tan( ToRad( fov_y ) / 2.0f );

    return TMat44{ 
        TVec4{ t / r, 0.0f,  0.0f,                 0.0f },
        TVec4{ 0.0f,  t,     0.0f,                 0.0f },
        TVec4{ 0.0f,  0.0f, -fn / f_n,            -1.0f },
        TVec4{ 0.0f,  0.0f, -2.0f*far*near / f_n,  0.0f }
    };
}


On the viewport the X-axis points to the left, the Y-axis up and the Z-axis out of the view (Note in a right hand system the Z-Axis is the cross product of the X-Axis and the Y-Axis).

The following code does the same as gluLookAt or glm::lookAt does:

using TVec3  = std::array< float, 3 >;
using TVec4  = std::array< float, 4 >;
using TMat44 = std::array< TVec4, 4 >;

TVec3 Cross( TVec3 a, TVec3 b ) { return { a[1] * b[2] - a[2] * b[1], a[2] * b[0] - a[0] * b[2], a[0] * b[1] - a[1] * b[0] }; }
float Dot( TVec3 a, TVec3 b ) { return a[0]*b[0] + a[1]*b[1] + a[2]*b[2]; }
void Normalize( TVec3 & v )
{
    float len = sqrt( v[0] * v[0] + v[1] * v[1] + v[2] * v[2] );
    v[0] /= len; v[1] /= len; v[2] /= len;
}

TMat44 Camera::LookAt( const TVec3 &pos, const TVec3 &target, const TVec3 &up )
{ 
    TVec3 mz = { pos[0] - target[0], pos[1] - target[1], pos[2] - target[2] };
    Normalize( mz );
    TVec3 my = { up[0], up[1], up[2] };
    TVec3 mx = Cross( my, mz );
    Normalize( mx );
    my = Cross( mz, mx );

    TMat44 v{
        TVec4{ mx[0], my[0], mz[0], 0.0f },
        TVec4{ mx[1], my[1], mz[1], 0.0f },
        TVec4{ mx[2], my[2], mz[2], 0.0f },
        TVec4{ Dot(mx, pos), Dot(my, pos), -Dot(mz, pos), 1.0f }
    };

    return v;
}

Adapt your code like this:

AV4X4FLOAT formViewModelMatrix(AV4FLOAT pos,AV4FLOAT target,AV4FLOAT up)
{ 
    AV4FLOAT mz;
    mz.x = pos.x - target.x; mz.y = pos.y - target.y; mz.z = pos.z - target.z; mz.w = 1.0f;
    mz.normalize();

    AV4FLOAT my;
    my.x = up.x; my.y = up.y; my.z = up.z; my.w = 1.0f;

    AV4FLOAT mx;
    mx.x = my.y*mz.z - my.z*mz.y; mx.y = my.z*mz.x - my.x*mz.z; mx.z = my.x*mz.y - my.y*mz.x; mx.w = 1.0f;
    mx.normylize();

    my.x = mz.y*mx.z - mz.z*mx.y; my.y = mz.z*mx.x - mz.x*mx.z; my.z = mz.x*mx.y - mz.y*mx.x; my.w = 1.0f;

    AV4FLOAT t;
    t.x = mx.x*pos.x + mx.y*pos.y + mx.z*pos.z; 
    t.y = my.x*pos.x + my.y*pos.y + my.z*pos.z; 
    t.z = -(mz.x*pos.x + mz.y*pos.y + mz.z*pos.z); 

    AV4X4FLOAT m;
    m[0]  = mx.x;  m[1]  = my.x;  m[2]  = mz.x;  m[3]  = 0.0f;
    m[4]  = mx.y;  m[5]  = my.y;  m[6]  = mz.y;  m[7]  = 0.0f;
    m[8]  = mx.z;  m[9]  = my.z;  m[10] = mz.z;  m[11] = 0.0f;
    m[12] = t.x;   m[13] = t.y;   m[14] = t.z;   m[15] = 1.0f;

    return m
}


See further the answers to the following question:

  • How to render depth linearly in modern OpenGL with gl_FragCoord.z in fragment shader?
  • How to recover view space position given view space depth value and ndc xy
  • Transform the modelMatrix
  • Stretching Issue with Custom View Matrix

这篇关于透视投影和视图矩阵:深度缓冲区和三角形面方向在 OpenGL 中反转的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!

本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!

相关文档推荐

Prevent class inheritance in C++(防止 C++ 中的类继承)
Why should I declare a virtual destructor for an abstract class in C++?(为什么要在 C++ 中为抽象类声明虚拟析构函数?)
Why is Default constructor called in virtual inheritance?(为什么在虚拟继承中调用默认构造函数?)
C++ cast to derived class(C++ 转换为派生类)
C++ virtual function return type(C++虚函数返回类型)
Is there any real risk to deriving from the C++ STL containers?(从 C++ STL 容器派生是否有任何真正的风险?)