构造函数初始化列表求值顺序

Constructor initialization-list evaluation order(构造函数初始化列表求值顺序)
本文介绍了构造函数初始化列表求值顺序的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有一个带有一些参数的构造函数.我曾假设它们是按照列出的顺序构建的,但在一种情况下,它们似乎是反向构建的,导致中止.当我反转参数时,程序停止中止.这是我正在使用的语法示例.问题是,在这种情况下, a_ 需要在 b_ 之前初始化.你能保证施工顺序吗?

I have a constructor that takes some arguments. I had assumed that they were constructed in the order listed, but in one case it appears they were being constructed in reverse resulting in an abort. When I reversed the arguments the program stopped aborting. This is an example of the syntax I'm using. The thing is, a_ needs to be initialized before b_ in this case. Can you guarantee the order of construction?

例如

class A
{
  public:
    A(OtherClass o, string x, int y) :
      a_(o), b_(a_, x, y) { }

    OtherClass a_;
    AnotherClass b_;
};

推荐答案

取决于类中成员变量声明的顺序.所以 a_ 将是第一个,然后 b_ 将是您示例中的第二个.

It depends on the order of member variable declaration in the class. So a_ will be the first one, then b_ will be the second one in your example.

这篇关于构造函数初始化列表求值顺序的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!

本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!

相关文档推荐

Prevent class inheritance in C++(防止 C++ 中的类继承)
Why should I declare a virtual destructor for an abstract class in C++?(为什么要在 C++ 中为抽象类声明虚拟析构函数?)
Why is Default constructor called in virtual inheritance?(为什么在虚拟继承中调用默认构造函数?)
C++ cast to derived class(C++ 转换为派生类)
C++ virtual function return type(C++虚函数返回类型)
Is there any real risk to deriving from the C++ STL containers?(从 C++ STL 容器派生是否有任何真正的风险?)