为什么虚拟基类必须由最派生的类构造?

Why must virtual base classes be constructed by the most derived class?(为什么虚拟基类必须由最派生的类构造?)
本文介绍了为什么虚拟基类必须由最派生的类构造?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

以下代码无法编译:

class A {
public:
    A(int) {}
};

class B: virtual public A {
public:
    B(): A(0) {}
};

// most derived class
class C: public B {
public:
    C() {} // wrong!!!
};

如果我在C的构造函数初始化列表中调用A的构造函数,即:

If I call A's constructor in C's constructor initialization list, that is:

// most derived class
class C: public B {
public:
    C(): A(0) {} // OK!!!
};

确实有效.

显然,这是因为虚拟基类必须始终由大多数派生类构建.

Apparently, the reason is because virtual base classes must always be constructed by the most derived classes.

我不明白这个限制背后的原因.

I don't understand the reason behind this limitation.

推荐答案

因为它避免了这个:

class A {
public:
    A(int) {}
};

class B0: virtual public A {
public:
    B0(): A(0) {}
};

class B1: virtual public A {
public:
    B1(): A(1) {}
};

class C: public B0, public B1 {
public:
    C() {} // How is A constructed? A(0) from B0 or A(1) from B1?
};

这篇关于为什么虚拟基类必须由最派生的类构造?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!

本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!

相关文档推荐

Prevent class inheritance in C++(防止 C++ 中的类继承)
Why should I declare a virtual destructor for an abstract class in C++?(为什么要在 C++ 中为抽象类声明虚拟析构函数?)
Why is Default constructor called in virtual inheritance?(为什么在虚拟继承中调用默认构造函数?)
C++ cast to derived class(C++ 转换为派生类)
C++ virtual function return type(C++虚函数返回类型)
Is there any real risk to deriving from the C++ STL containers?(从 C++ STL 容器派生是否有任何真正的风险?)