从头到尾迭代C++向量

Iterating C++ vector from the end to the beginning(从头到尾迭代C++向量)
本文介绍了从头到尾迭代C++向量的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

限时送ChatGPT账号..

是否可以从尾到头迭代一个向量?

Is it possible to iterate a vector from the end to the beginning?

for (vector<my_class>::iterator i = my_vector.end();
        i != my_vector.begin(); /* ?! */ ) {
}

或者只有这样的事情才有可能:

Or is that only possible with something like that:

for (int i = my_vector.size() - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
}

推荐答案

一种方法是:

for (vector<my_class>::reverse_iterator i = my_vector.rbegin(); 
        i != my_vector.rend(); ++i ) { 
} 

rbegin()/rend() 专为此目的而设计.(是的,增加 reverse_interator 会将其向后移动.)

rbegin()/rend() were especially designed for that purpose. (And yes, incrementing a reverse_interator moves it backward.)

现在,理论上,您的方法(使用 begin()/end() & --i)会起作用,std::vector 的迭代器是双向的,但请记住,end() 不是最后一个元素 - 它是最后一个元素之后的一个,因此您必须递减首先,当你到达 begin() 时你就完成了——但你仍然需要做你的处理.

Now, in theory, your method (using begin()/end() & --i) would work, std::vector's iterator being bidirectional, but remember, end() isn't the last element — it's one beyond the last element, so you'd have to decrement first, and you are done when you reach begin() — but you still have to do your processing.

vector<my_class>::iterator i = my_vector.end();
while (i != my_vector.begin())
{
     --i;
    /*do stuff */

} 

更新:在将 for() 循环重写为 while() 循环时,我显然过于激进.(重要的部分是 --i 在开头.)

UPDATE: I was apparently too aggressive in re-writing the for() loop into a while() loop. (The important part is that the --i is at the beginning.)

这篇关于从头到尾迭代C++向量的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!

本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!

相关文档推荐

OpenGL transforming objects with multiple rotations of Different axis(OpenGL 变换不同轴多次旋转的对象)
GLFW first responder error(GLFW 第一响应者错误)
SOIL not linking correctly(SOIL 连接不正确)
Core profile vs version string? Only getting GLSL 1.3/OGL 3.0 in mesa 10.0.1(核心配置文件与版本字符串?在 mesa 10.0.1 中只获得 GLSL 1.3/OGL 3.0)
What is the range of OpenGL texture ID?(OpenGL 纹理 ID 的范围是多少?)
How taxing are OpenGL glDrawElements() calls compared to basic logic code?(与基本逻辑代码相比,OpenGL glDrawElements() 调用的繁重程度如何?)