C++中向量的初始容量

Initial capacity of vector in C++(C++中向量的初始容量)
本文介绍了C++中向量的初始容量的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

限时送ChatGPT账号..

使用默认构造函数创建的 std::vectorcapacity() 是多少?我知道 size() 为零.我们可以声明默认构造的向量不会调用堆内存分配吗?

What is the capacity() of an std::vector which is created using the default constuctor? I know that the size() is zero. Can we state that a default constructed vector does not call heap memory allocation?

通过这种方式,可以使用单个分配创建具有任意保留的数组,例如 std::vector;四;iv.reserve(2345);.假设出于某种原因,我不想在 2345 上启动 size().

This way it would be possible to create an array with an arbitrary reserve using a single allocation, like std::vector<int> iv; iv.reserve(2345);. Let's say that for some reason, I do not want to start the size() on 2345.

例如,在 Linux(g++ 4.4.5,内核 2.6.32 amd64)上

For example, on Linux (g++ 4.4.5, kernel 2.6.32 amd64)

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

int main()
{
  using namespace std;
  cout << vector<int>().capacity() << "," << vector<int>(10).capacity() << endl;
  return 0;
}

打印0,10.这是规则,还是取决于 STL 供应商?

printed 0,10. Is it a rule, or is it STL vendor dependent?

推荐答案

该标准没有指定容器的初始 capacity 应该是多少,因此您依赖于实现.一个常见的实现将从零开始容量,但不能保证.另一方面,没有办法改善 std::vector 的策略.四;iv.reserve(2345); 所以坚持下去.

The standard doesn't specify what the initial capacity of a container should be, so you're relying on the implementation. A common implementation will start the capacity at zero, but there's no guarantee. On the other hand there's no way to better your strategy of std::vector<int> iv; iv.reserve(2345); so stick with it.

这篇关于C++中向量的初始容量的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!

本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!

相关文档推荐

OpenGL transforming objects with multiple rotations of Different axis(OpenGL 变换不同轴多次旋转的对象)
GLFW first responder error(GLFW 第一响应者错误)
SOIL not linking correctly(SOIL 连接不正确)
Core profile vs version string? Only getting GLSL 1.3/OGL 3.0 in mesa 10.0.1(核心配置文件与版本字符串?在 mesa 10.0.1 中只获得 GLSL 1.3/OGL 3.0)
What is the range of OpenGL texture ID?(OpenGL 纹理 ID 的范围是多少?)
How taxing are OpenGL glDrawElements() calls compared to basic logic code?(与基本逻辑代码相比,OpenGL glDrawElements() 调用的繁重程度如何?)