• <small id='rF08I'></small><noframes id='rF08I'>

      <bdo id='rF08I'></bdo><ul id='rF08I'></ul>
    <legend id='rF08I'><style id='rF08I'><dir id='rF08I'><q id='rF08I'></q></dir></style></legend>
      <tfoot id='rF08I'></tfoot>
      <i id='rF08I'><tr id='rF08I'><dt id='rF08I'><q id='rF08I'><span id='rF08I'><b id='rF08I'><form id='rF08I'><ins id='rF08I'></ins><ul id='rF08I'></ul><sub id='rF08I'></sub></form><legend id='rF08I'></legend><bdo id='rF08I'><pre id='rF08I'><center id='rF08I'></center></pre></bdo></b><th id='rF08I'></th></span></q></dt></tr></i><div id='rF08I'><tfoot id='rF08I'></tfoot><dl id='rF08I'><fieldset id='rF08I'></fieldset></dl></div>
      1. c++ 将 find() 映射到可能的 insert():如何优化操作?

        c++ map find() to possibly insert(): how to optimize operations?(c++ 将 find() 映射到可能的 insert():如何优化操作?)
          <tfoot id='L9CRE'></tfoot>
        • <legend id='L9CRE'><style id='L9CRE'><dir id='L9CRE'><q id='L9CRE'></q></dir></style></legend>

          <i id='L9CRE'><tr id='L9CRE'><dt id='L9CRE'><q id='L9CRE'><span id='L9CRE'><b id='L9CRE'><form id='L9CRE'><ins id='L9CRE'></ins><ul id='L9CRE'></ul><sub id='L9CRE'></sub></form><legend id='L9CRE'></legend><bdo id='L9CRE'><pre id='L9CRE'><center id='L9CRE'></center></pre></bdo></b><th id='L9CRE'></th></span></q></dt></tr></i><div id='L9CRE'><tfoot id='L9CRE'></tfoot><dl id='L9CRE'><fieldset id='L9CRE'></fieldset></dl></div>

              <tbody id='L9CRE'></tbody>

            <small id='L9CRE'></small><noframes id='L9CRE'>

              <bdo id='L9CRE'></bdo><ul id='L9CRE'></ul>

                1. 本文介绍了c++ 将 find() 映射到可能的 insert():如何优化操作?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!

                  问题描述

                  我正在使用 STL 地图数据结构,目前我的代码首先调用 find():如果键之前不在地图中,它会调用 insert()它,否则它什么都不做.

                  I'm using the STL map data structure, and at the moment my code first invokes find(): if the key was not previously in the map, it calls insert() it, otherwise it does nothing.

                  map<Foo*, string>::iterator it;
                  it = my_map.find(foo_obj);   // 1st lookup
                  
                  if(it == my_map.end()){
                    my_map[foo_obj] = "some value";  // 2nd lookup
                  }else{
                    // ok do nothing.
                  }
                  

                  我想知道是否有比这更好的方法,因为据我所知,在这种情况下,当我想插入一个尚不存在的键时,我在地图数据结构中执行了 2 次查找:一个对于 find()insert() 中的一个(对应于 operator[] ).

                  I was wondering if there is a better way than this, because as far as I can tell, in this case when I want to insert a key that is not present yet, I perform 2 lookups in the map data structures: one for find(), one in the insert() (which corresponds to the operator[] ).

                  预先感谢您的任何建议.

                  Thanks in advance for any suggestion.

                  推荐答案

                  通常,如果您执行查找和插入操作,那么您希望保留(并检索)已存在的旧值.如果您只想覆盖任何旧值,map[foo_obj]="some value" 会这样做.

                  Normally if you do a find and maybe an insert, then you want to keep (and retrieve) the old value if it already existed. If you just want to overwrite any old value, map[foo_obj]="some value" will do that.

                  以下是获取旧值的方法,如果不存在则插入一个新值,通过一次地图查找:

                  Here's how you get the old value, or insert a new one if it didn't exist, with one map lookup:

                  typedef std::map<Foo*,std::string> M;
                  typedef M::iterator I;
                  std::pair<I,bool> const& r=my_map.insert(M::value_type(foo_obj,"some value"));
                  if (r.second) { 
                      // value was inserted; now my_map[foo_obj]="some value"
                  } else {
                      // value wasn't inserted because my_map[foo_obj] already existed.
                      // note: the old value is available through r.first->second
                      // and may not be "some value"
                  }
                  // in any case, r.first->second holds the current value of my_map[foo_obj]
                  

                  这是一个足够常见的习惯用法,您可能想要使用辅助函数:

                  This is a common enough idiom that you may want to use a helper function:

                  template <class M,class Key>
                  typename M::mapped_type &
                  get_else_update(M &m,Key const& k,typename M::mapped_type const& v) {
                      return m.insert(typename M::value_type(k,v)).first->second;
                  }
                  
                  get_else_update(my_map,foo_obj,"some value");
                  

                  如果你有一个昂贵的 v 计算,如果它已经存在,你想跳过它(例如记忆),你也可以概括:

                  If you have an expensive computation for v you want to skip if it already exists (e.g. memoization), you can generalize that too:

                  template <class M,class Key,class F>
                  typename M::mapped_type &
                  get_else_compute(M &m,Key const& k,F f) {
                     typedef typename M::mapped_type V;
                     std::pair<typename M::iterator,bool> r=m.insert(typename M::value_type(k,V()));
                     V &v=r.first->second;
                     if (r.second)
                        f(v);
                     return v;
                  }
                  

                  例如在哪里

                  struct F {
                    void operator()(std::string &val) const 
                    { val=std::string("some value")+" that is expensive to compute"; }
                  };
                  get_else_compute(my_map,foo_obj,F());
                  

                  如果映射类型不是默认可构造的,则让 F 提供默认值,或者向 get_else_compute 添加另一个参数.

                  If the mapped type isn't default constructible, then make F provide a default value, or add another argument to get_else_compute.

                  这篇关于c++ 将 find() 映射到可能的 insert():如何优化操作?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!

                  本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!

                  相关文档推荐

                  Unable to access non-const member functions of objects in C++ std::set(无法访问 C++ std::set 中对象的非常量成员函数)
                  How should a size-limited stl-like container be implemented?(应该如何实现大小受限的 stl 类容器?)
                  Constructing std::function argument from lambda(从 lambda 构造 std::function 参数)
                  STL BigInt class implementation(STL BigInt 类实现)
                  Sync is unreliable using std::atomic and std::condition_variable(使用 std::atomic 和 std::condition_variable 同步不可靠)
                  Move list element to the end in STL(在 STL 中将列表元素移动到末尾)
                  <i id='HLae0'><tr id='HLae0'><dt id='HLae0'><q id='HLae0'><span id='HLae0'><b id='HLae0'><form id='HLae0'><ins id='HLae0'></ins><ul id='HLae0'></ul><sub id='HLae0'></sub></form><legend id='HLae0'></legend><bdo id='HLae0'><pre id='HLae0'><center id='HLae0'></center></pre></bdo></b><th id='HLae0'></th></span></q></dt></tr></i><div id='HLae0'><tfoot id='HLae0'></tfoot><dl id='HLae0'><fieldset id='HLae0'></fieldset></dl></div>
                    • <small id='HLae0'></small><noframes id='HLae0'>

                        <bdo id='HLae0'></bdo><ul id='HLae0'></ul>
                        <tfoot id='HLae0'></tfoot>

                            <legend id='HLae0'><style id='HLae0'><dir id='HLae0'><q id='HLae0'></q></dir></style></legend>
                              <tbody id='HLae0'></tbody>