EF 4.1/Linq-to-SQL:什么更好:使用 Equals 还是 ==?

EF 4.1 / Linq-to-SQL: What is better: using Equals or ==?(EF 4.1/Linq-to-SQL:什么更好:使用 Equals 还是 ==?)
本文介绍了EF 4.1/Linq-to-SQL:什么更好:使用 Equals 还是 ==?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

We're having a discussion about using Equals or == on an int comparison in a LINQ query. We're using EF4.1 Code First. What is better?

var query = context.Boodschappen
                   .Where(b => b.BoodschapID == id).FirstOrDefault();

or:

var query = context.Boodschappen
                   .Where(b => b.BoodschapID.Equals(id)).FirstOrDefault();

And why?

解决方案

For Linq To Sql, you want neither. Instead, use Object.Equals: .Where(b => Object.Equals(b.BoodschapID, id)

Why? Because of a Bug in the SQL Generator if id happens to be a nullable uniqueidentifier. If using b.BoodschapID.Equals(id) or b.BoodschapID == id and b.BoodschapID happens to be a nullable Guid, the generated SQL will not be WHERE BoodschapID IS NULL but rather WHERE BoodschapID = @p0 which will not return any results.

I know for sure that EF used to have the same bug. No idea if it's solved yet. You can find more details in this question, just be aware that some of the answers generate horrendous SQL.

Apart from that, there is no difference between Equals and == in Linq To SQL that I'm aware of.

这篇关于EF 4.1/Linq-to-SQL:什么更好:使用 Equals 还是 ==?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!

本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!

相关文档推荐

Is Unpivot (Not Pivot) functionality available in Linq to SQL? How?(Linq to SQL 中是否提供 Unpivot(非 Pivot)功能?如何?)
How to know if a field is numeric in Linq To SQL(如何在 Linq To SQL 中知道字段是否为数字)
Linq2SQl eager load with multiple DataLoadOptions(具有多个 DataLoadOptions 的 Linq2SQl 急切加载)
Extract sql query from LINQ expressions(从 LINQ 表达式中提取 sql 查询)
LINQ Where in collection clause(LINQ Where in collection 子句)
Orderby() not ordering numbers correctly c#(Orderby() 没有正确排序数字 c#)