问题描述
无法找出使用匹配器来识别我所针对的交换方法的重载的正确方法.我正在拨打的电话:
Can't figure out the correct way to use matchers to identify which overload of the exchange method I am targetting. The call I am making:
restTemplate.exchange(url, HttpMethod.PUT, httpEntity, Object.class)
我尝试过使用 any(Class.class) 和其他一些东西，但没有任何效果.我试图区分两种具有相似签名的方法:
I've tried using any(Class.class), and a couple other things but nothing is working. There are 2 methods with a similar signature that I am trying to distinguish between:
exchange(String url, HttpMethod 方法, @Nullable HttpEntity<?> requestEntity, Class<T> responseType)
和
exchange(String var1, HttpMethod var2, @Nullable HttpEntity
这是我目前与 Mockito 相关的导入:
Here are my current imports related to Mockito:
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.MockitoAnnotations;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.any;
import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.anyString;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;
是否有人能够模拟对使用 Class 作为第四个参数而不是 ParameterizedTypeReference 的方法的调用?
Has anyone been able to mock a call to this method that uses a Class as the 4th parameter instead of a ParameterizedTypeReference?
推荐答案
我不确定是我误解了你的问题还是 @MarciejKowalski 提到的问题，但是从问题运行测试时或我认为与您针对 mockito-core-2.23.4/JDK 1.8.0_151 的示例类似，它工作得很好.
I am not sure whether I misunderstood your question or the issue mentioned by @MarciejKowalski, but when running the test from the issue or what I suppose is similar to your example against mockito-core-2.23.4 / JDK 1.8.0_151 it works just fine.
[我在您的示例中使用了 JUnit 4 而不是 JUnit 5]
[I used JUnit 4 for your example instead of JUnit 5]
import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.any;
import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.mockito.Mockito;
import org.mockito.junit.MockitoJUnitRunner;
import org.springframework.core.ParameterizedTypeReference;
import org.springframework.http.HttpEntity;
import org.springframework.http.HttpMethod;
import org.springframework.http.ResponseEntity;
import org.springframework.web.client.RestTemplate;
@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class MockitoTest {
@Test
public void test() {
RestTemplate api = Mockito.mock(RestTemplate.class);
ResponseEntity<?> response1 = Mockito.mock(ResponseEntity.class);
ResponseEntity<?> response2 = Mockito.mock(ResponseEntity.class);
Mockito.when(api.exchange(any(String.class), any(HttpMethod.class), any(HttpEntity.class), any(Class.class))).thenReturn(response1);
Mockito.when(api.exchange(any(String.class), any(HttpMethod.class), any(HttpEntity.class), any(ParameterizedTypeReference.class))).thenReturn(response2);
ParameterizedTypeReference mock = Mockito.mock(ParameterizedTypeReference.class);
Assert.assertEquals(response1, api.exchange("", HttpMethod.GET, new HttpEntity(""), String.class));
Assert.assertEquals(response2, api.exchange("", HttpMethod.GET, new HttpEntity(""), mock));
}
}
这篇关于模棱两可的方法调用模拟 RestTemplate.exchange()的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持跟版网！