问题描述

我搜索了 Eclipse 的代码覆盖率插件.我的问题很简单:

I search a code coverage plugin for eclipse. My question is simple:

你在 Eclipse 中使用哪个插件来进行代码覆盖，为什么?

Which plugin do you use with eclipse for code coverage and why ?

推荐答案

编辑 (2015) - 我目前的建议:EclEmma/JaCoCo.

Edit (2015) - My current recommendation: EclEmma / JaCoCo.

不知道为什么我在 2012 年 1 月没有看到这一点，因为当时显然正在积极开发新版本，甚至在那时也一直在复制.

Not sure why I didn't see this back in January 2012, as there was clearly active development with new versions consistently being reproduced even back then.

从那以后，我对 Cobertura/eCobertura 感到有些沮丧，因为此后的开发似乎停滞不前，对当前 Java 版本的支持开始有所缺乏.

I've since become a bit frustrated with Cobertura / eCobertura, as development since seems to have stalled, with support for current Java versions starting to be somewhat lacking.

JaCoCo 可能自 2012 年我上次看到它以来已经取得了进步(或者我完全错过了它，或者正在研究 EMMA 与 JaCoCo) - 但当前版本为 Eclipse 提供了出色的内置支持(由 EclEmma 提供)以及许多其他 IDE，支持 Apache Maven、Apache Ant、命令行、Java API 和许多其他第三方集成.请参阅 http://www.eclemma.org/jacoco 的完整列表/trunk/doc/integrations.html .

JaCoCo may have advanced since I last looked at this in 2012 (or I simply missed it entirely, or was looking at EMMA vs. JaCoCo) - but the current version provides excellent support built-in to Eclipse (provided by EclEmma) as well as many other IDEs, support for Apache Maven, Apache Ant, command-line, Java API, and many other third-party integrations. Please refer to the complete list at http://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/trunk/doc/integrations.html .

我现在正在将我的一些项目从 Cobertura 切换到 JaCoCo，并且对集成和结果印象深刻 - 无论是在 Maven 报告中还是在 Eclipse 中.不确定是否有竞争解决方案，但 JaCoCo 甚至可以配置为在未满足某些代码覆盖率阈值时使构建失败.

I am now switching some of my projects over to JaCoCo from Cobertura, and am very impressed by the integration and results - both in Maven reports as well as Eclipse. Not sure about competing solutions, but JaCoCo can even be configured to fail a build if certain thresholds of code coverage are not met.

JaCoCo 专门记录了从 1.0 版到 1.8 版的 Java 类文件*.

JaCoCo is specifically documented to support Java class files from version 1.0 all the way through 1.8*.

我发现他们的使命宣言非常值得尊重.

I find their Mission Statement very respect-worthy.

参考/资源:

尤其不幸的是，这个问题已被关闭，这里有一个迷你目录，其中包含我在做出决定时使用的一些各种参考资料和资源 - 我鼓励这里的每个人都参考这些资料，以便做出自己的决定.

Especially as this question has unfortunately been closed, here is a mini-directory of some of the various references and resources that I used in making my decision - and which I encourage everyone here to refer to in order to make their own decisions.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Code_Coverage_Tools - 维基百科的性质更像是一个动态文档"，并有望通过任何可能可用的新相关工具保持更新.
• 以下内容在某种程度上也应属于动态文档"的同一类别，但可能存在偏见/利益冲突 - 因为每个都来自同样生产此类工具的供应商或组织:
  • http://www.eclemma.org/resources.html(提供 EclEmma，JaCoCo)
  • https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CLOVER/Comparison+of+code+coverage+tools(提供 Atlassian Clover)
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Code_Coverage_Tools - by Wikipedia's nature is more of a "living document", and will hopefully remain updated with any new related tools that may become available.
  • The following should also somewhat fall into the same category of a "living document", but fall under probable bias / conflicts of interest - as each is from the vendor or organization that also produces such a tool:
    • http://www.eclemma.org/resources.html (Provides EclEmma, JaCoCo)
    • https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CLOVER/Comparison+of+code+coverage+tools (Provides Atlassian Clover)
    • 声纳中的代码覆盖率工具(JaCoCo、Cobertura、Emma)比较(2012-12-19，Patroklos Papapetrou，onlysoftware.wordpress.com)
    • Eclipse 代码覆盖插件(2012-01-28，stackoverflow.com)
    • 测试覆盖率:jaCoCo vs Clover2(Jakub Kurlenda，2010-12-28，kurlenda.blogspot.com)
    • Java 代码覆盖率:Cobertura vs. Emma vs Clover(Tom Borthwick，2010-10-23，copperykeenclaws.com)
    • 选择你的代码覆盖工具声纳 2.2(2010-08-05，Evgeny Mandrikov，sonarqube.org)
    • 追求代码质量:不要被覆盖面所迷惑报告(Andrew Glover，2006-01-31，ibm.com)
    • Code Coverage Tools (JaCoCo, Cobertura, Emma) Comparison in Sonar (2012-12-19, Patroklos Papapetrou, onlysoftware.wordpress.com)
    • Eclipse plugin for code coverage (2012-01-28, stackoverflow.com)
    • Test coverage: jaCoCo vs Clover2 (Jakub Kurlenda, 2010-12-28, kurlenda.blogspot.com)
    • Java Code Coverage: Cobertura vs. Emma vs Clover (Tom Borthwick, 2010-10-23, copperykeenclaws.com)
    • Pick your code coverage tool in Sonar 2.2 (2010-08-05, Evgeny Mandrikov, sonarqube.org)
    • In pursuit of code quality: Don't be fooled by the coverage report (Andrew Glover, 2006-01-31, ibm.com)

    上一个:

    eCobertura.

    它可以胜任，它是免费和开源的，它比 EMMA，它被我熟悉的大多数其他在线开源项目所使用.它还可以很好地集成到 Maven 中 - 包括一些相当漂亮的报告.

    It does the job, it is free and open-source, it is more up-to-date than EMMA, and it is used by most of the other online open-source projects I'm familiar with. It also integrates very well into Maven - including some rather nice-looking reports.

    如果您想考虑商业产品，我会考虑 Atlassian 的 Clover.

    If you want to consider a commercial product, I'd consider Atlassian's Clover.

    这篇关于用于代码覆盖的 Eclipse 插件的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持跟版网！

    本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益，请联系我们，我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除！