本文介绍了为什么 bool(xml.etree.ElementTree.Element) 评估为 False?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
import xml.etree.ElementTree as ET
e = ET.Element('Brock',Role="Bodyguard")
print bool(e)
为什么 xml.etree.ElementTree.Element
被认为是 False
?
Why is an xml.etree.ElementTree.Element
considered False
?
我知道我可以执行 if e is not None
来检查是否存在.但我强烈希望 bool(e)
返回 True
.
I know that I can do if e is not None
to check for existence. But I would strongly expect bool(e)
to return True
.
推荐答案
事实证明,如果 Element
对象没有子对象,则将其视为 False
值.
As it turns out, Element
objects are considered a False
value if they have no children.
我在源代码中找到了这个:
I found this in the source:
def __nonzero__(self):
warnings.warn(
"The behavior of this method will change in future versions. "
"Use specific 'len(elem)' or 'elem is not None' test instead.",
FutureWarning, stacklevel=2
)
return len(self._children) != 0 # emulate old behaviour, for now
即使是内联评论也同意你的看法——这种行为是有问题的;)
Even the inline comment agrees with you -- this behavior is iffy ;)
这篇关于为什么 bool(xml.etree.ElementTree.Element) 评估为 False?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!
本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!